Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Antibiotics use evaluation among hospitalized adult patients at Jimma Medical Center, southwestern Ethiopia: the way to pave for antimicrobial stewardship

Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice volume 15, Article number: 84 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

An irrational antibiotic use is a common problem in developing countries like Ethiopia, which makes empiric antibiotics use difficult. It is considered to be the greatest health problem in our time and future unless intervened. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the patterns of antibiotics use among hospitalized adult patients to pave the way for antimicrobial stewardship.

Methods

A hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted at Jimma Medical Center, southwestern Ethiopia, from 30 October 2020 to 29 January 2021 with 360 adult hospitalized patients participating. A semi-structured questionnaire and consecutive sampling technique was used for data collection. The data were collected through medical record reviews and patient interviews. The collected data were entered into Epi-data and exported to SPSS® version 23.0 for analysis. Days of therapy (DOT) and essential medicine lists “Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe)” antibiotics classification were used to assess antibiotic use pattern among participants.

Results

The majority of study participants were females (55.3%), attended formal education (59.4%), and live in rural areas (61.4%) with mean age ± (SD) of 37.65 ± (16.75). The overall rate of antibiotics consumption during the study was 111 days of therapy per 100 bed-days and about two-thirds (66%) of the prescribed antibiotics were from the “Watch” group antibiotics. The indicator level of antibiotics use for “Access” group antibiotics was 34% in this study based on the World Health Organization Essential Medicine List. Cephalosporins were the most commonly used class of antibiotics (93.9%).

Conclusion

Higher antibiotics exposure and their consumption frequently observed among adult hospitalized patients in the study setting. There was a rapid increase in “Watch” group antibiotics use and about two-thirds of the prescribed antibiotics were from this group. The third-generation cephalosporin were the most commonly used class of antibiotics. Generally, higher consumption and inappropriate antibiotics use among hospitalized adult patients showed the need for urgent interventions by implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in hospitals.

Background

Antibiotics are medications used in bacterial infection prevention or/and treatment. Currently, antibiotics are facing global public health threats such as antimicrobial resistance and inappropriate use [1]. According to World Health Organization (WHO), more than two-thirds of antibiotics are used in hospitals and of these antibiotics, about 30% are used inappropriately globally [2].

Excessive antibiotics use may lead to the development of their resistance [3, 4]. There is a stronger link between high antibiotics consumption and their resistance. Globally, increased consumption of antibiotics not only produces greater antibiotics resistance at individual patient, but also at the community level due to irrational antibiotics use [4].

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the greatest global health problem and deserves more attention to ensure effective long-term antibiotics use [5]. The acceleration of AMR and the decline in the development of new antimicrobial to combat a problem has also created significant challenges to health care systems [6]. Inappropriate antibiotics utilization and resistance of antibiotics are increasingly important public health issues based on alarming accumulated facts regarding antibiotics misuse and their resistance in the previous few years [7, 8].

The overall inappropriate antibiotics use is about one-third in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Almost 90% of antibiotics prescribed are broad-spectrum agents such as third or fourth-generation Cephalosporins, which need implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in hospitals [9]. Rapid increases in “Watch” group antibiotics use, particularly in LMICs, indicate challenges in antimicrobial stewardship [10].

The proportions of irrational antibiotics utilization and their resistance across different countries are varied in Africa. Irrational antibiotics use is about 88.8% in Tanzania [11], 50% in Sudan [8], 7.9% in Zambia [8], and greater than 10% in other African countries [12]. The proportion of antimicrobial resistance was 58.3% in Nigeria, 12.5% in Ghana, 12.5% in Senegal [13], and more than half (60%) were from East Africa [14]. The prevalence of resistance to penicillin among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates ranged from 25–100% and 1.3–60% among tested isolates for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase reported in sub-Saharan Africa [15].

A systematic review and meta-analysis study conducted in Ethiopia reported, nearly half of the patients (48.5%) took antibiotics. Of those participants, more than 49% used antibiotics inappropriately and 59.7% resistance strains were identified. This study also showed practicing non-accordance to guidelines in the management of infectious diseases is a big challenging problem in Ethiopia which makes many bacteria resistant to antibiotics [16]. Therefore, the best way to tackle the consequence of antibiotics misuse will rely on the preservation of the existing antibiotics and designing appropriate antibiotics use strategies [17]. If irrational antibiotic utilization is not tackled early in health facilities, their consequences can be a serious problem to human beings near future [16, 18, 19].

Although different cross-sectional studies were conducted at community and outpatient levels on assessment of antimicrobial-related problems and their costs; antibiotics and their resistance patterns; and challenges of antibiotics use [20,21,22,23], there are limited studies addressing the antibiotic utilization at inpatient setting in Ethiopia, particularly at the study area. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the antibiotics use among hospitalized adult patients in Jimma Medical Center (JMC), southwestern Ethiopia, using a prospective observational study design.

Given the above problems and knowing the decline in the development of new antibiotics to combat the problems, it is important to investigate the antibiotics use pattern among hospitalized patients in Jimma Medical Center, to pave the way for antimicrobial stewardship using available antibiotics and resources on hand. Thus, this study will serve as input for the health care systems, health professionals, hospitalized patients, governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and ministers of health to make evidence-based decisions in the study area and other similar hospitals by large.

Methods and participants

Study design, study settings and period

A hospital-based prospective observational study conducted at the Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Gynecology/Obstetrics wards of Jimma Medical Center (JMC). JMC is the only tertiary hospital with a bed capacity of 800 in the southwestern part of Ethiopia located in Jimma town, 352 km far from Addis Ababa. The hospital has four major wards (Internal Medicine, Surgery, Gynecology/Obstetrics, and Pediatrics) and five other departments. It provides services for approximately 15,000 inpatients and 160,000 outpatient clients per year with a catchment population of about 20 million people living within the wide catchment area of the Jimma zone and the surrounding. It can serve 11,000 emergency cases and 4500 deliveries per year, and it has 1600 staff members with 32 care units. The study was conducted from 30 October 2020 to 29 January 2021.

Population

All adult patients who were admitted to Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Gynecology/Obstetrics wards of JMC; and who were taking antibiotics for treatment and/or prophylaxis purposes were source population. All hospitalized adult patients at Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Gynecology/Obstetrics wards of JMC, who were fulfilled the inclusion criteria during the study period were study population for this study.

Eligibility criteria

All adult patients who were admitted to Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Gynecology/Obstetrics wards and who received at least one systemic antibiotic for treatment and/or prophylaxis during the study period were included in the study. However, all patients with age less than 18 years; all adult patients who refused to participate in the study; and patients who were taking only anti-mycobacterial agents were excluded from the study. Note: Anti-mycobacterial agents are four drugs in fixed dose combination. It is difficult to compare them with a single antibiotic and calculating days of therapy for them can overestimate the study results as they taken throughout study period and beyond.

Sample size and sampling technique

Sample size (n) was calculated by using a single population proportion formula:

$$n= {(Z\alpha /2)}^{2}* \frac{P\left(1-P\right)}{{w}^{2}}={\left(1.96\right)}^{2}* \frac{0.50\left(1-0.50\right)}{{0.05}^{2}}=384,$$

where ‘P’ is the estimated proportion of antibiotic use practice in Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Gynecology/Obstetrics wards, which is 50% (P = 0.5). ‘Z’ is level of confidence = 1.96 with 95% confidence interval; and ‘W’ is the margin of error that the investigators are willing to accept, which is 5%.

Since N is less than 10,000 (N = 2174 patients: 918, 640 and 616 patients were from Internal Medicine, Surgery, and 616 Gynecology/Obstetrics ward, respectively), taken from three wards 1 year before the study period at a similar period, from 30 October 2019 to 29 January 2020. The information was obtained from the health management information system of the JMC report (hospital statistics office). By using the correction formula:

$$\mathrm{nf}=\frac{n}{\begin{array}{c}1+\frac{n}{N}\\ .\end{array}} =\frac{384}{\begin{array}{c}1+\frac{384}{2174}\\ .\end{array}}=327.$$

After adding 10% for non-response rate, the final sample size of this study was 360 adult admitted patients. Consecutive patients were recruited and consecutive sampling technique was used to collect data from 360 adult hospitalized patients from Internal Medicine (n = 152, 42.2%), Surgery (n = 106, 29.4%), and Gynecology/Obstetrics (n = 102, 28.3%), wards of JMC. Patients were recruited from each ward based on the reports of proportion of patient flow to each ward 1 year before the study period, from 30 October 2019 to 29 January 2020.

Data collection procedures

A semi-structured data abstraction format was developed from different studies. After the pre-test, the corrected version of the questionnaire was used to collect data. Data were collected through medical record reviews and patient interviews. The data collection involved three clinical pharmacists of Jimma Medical Center.

Data quality management

To maximize the quality of the data, training was given for data collectors for 1 day on how to fill the data collection instruments and extract the necessary information. The investigator also did close supervision and monitoring weekly and the whole quality of data was assured that all the facilities were measured in the same way in all the time considered. In addition, a pre-test was conducted using 5% of the total sample size (18 patients), outside of the study period. Patient medical records, admission, and discharge charts were used to collect data and patients were also interviewed for subjective data that were not recorded in patient’s medical records. After data collection, data were cleared, categorized, compiled, and checked for completeness and accuracy before being analyzed. Any erroneous and ambiguous data were excluded.

Data analysis procedures

The collected data were coded, entered into Epi-data, and exported to statistical package for social science (SPSS®) version 23.0 software for analysis. Categorical and continuous data were expressed as percentages and mean ± SD, respectively, to summarize patient baseline characteristics and the study findings.

Utilization rates were presented as days of therapy (DOT) per 100(0) bed-days (BD) to compare rates over time or among different wards and risk group participants. The most commonly used denominator to capture time at risk for patients was BD. Bed-days was calculated by an SPSS that measures the total number of occupied beds on inpatient wards per calendar day. Similarly, the DOT was also calculated and defined as a day of therapy as any calendar day in which at least a single dose of antibiotic was received. DOTs were counted separately for each antibiotic agent (for example, a patient on two different antibiotics simultaneously would count as 2 DOT on a single calendar day). World Health Organization Essential Medicine List (WHO 2019) and Ethiopian Essential Medicine List (EEML 2020) “Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe)” antibiotics classification were used to assess antibiotic use pattern among participants.

Results

Socio-demographic and disease characteristics of patients

Females accounted for about 55.3% of the study participants and 29.2% were housewives. The mean age (SD) of participants was 37.65 ± 16.75 (range: 18–99), and most of them, 262 (72.8%), were between the age range of 18 and 47 years. The majority of the study participants were attended formal education (59.4%), living in rural areas (61.4%), and farmers (24.4%). More than one-third of the participants had not a regular monthly income (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of hospitalized adult patients in JMC from 30 October 2020 to 29 January 2021 (n = 360)
Full size table

Of all the infection diagnoses, pneumonia (16.1%), urinary tract infection (15.3%), and acute appendicitis (13.9%) were the most common infectious diagnoses followed by traumatic injuries (7.8%), sepsis (7.5%), meningitis (6.7%) and opportunistic infections (5.0%). Pneumonia (14.2%), acute appendicitis (12.8%), and sepsis (5.8%) were the common infections in Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Gynecology/Obstetrics ward, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Infection diagnosis and types of suspected infectious condition among hospitalized adult patients in JMC wards during the study period (n = 360)
Full size table

More than half of study participants 196 (54.4%) had comorbidity conditions. Of all the comorbidities, hypertension 38 (19.4%), tuberculosis 17 (18.9%), and heart failure 35 (17.9%) were the most common comorbidities and followed by acute/chronic kidney diseases 26 (13.3%) and 26 (13.3%) chronic pulmonary diseases (Table 3).

Table 3 Infections and non-infectious comorbidities among hospitalized adult patients in JMC wards during the study period (n = 360)
Full size table

Antibiotics utilization patterns

  1. A.

    Antibiotics use patterns using antibiotics metrics

    A given patient with an infection diagnosis was exposed to 1–10 antibiotics with a mean of greater than two. The mean DOT per patient was 21.5, 12.8, and 8.9 for medical, surgical, and gynecology/obstetrics wards, respectively. The mean of DOT per patient was 15.4 ± 14.4 SD with an overall average (mean ± SD) bed-days of 13.9 ± 9.0 for the settings.

    The overall rate of antibiotics consumption during the study was 111 per 100 BD. The consumption of antibiotics was 120.9 DOT/100 BD in Internal Medicine, 105.1 DOT/100 BD in Surgery, and 91.8 DOT/100 BD in the Gynecology/Obstetrics ward. The frequency of daily antibiotics consumption during the study period was higher in the Medical ward 3266 DOTs (61.1%) compared with surgery ward 1359 DOTs (24.5%) versus 912 DOTs (16.4%) in the Gynecology/Obstetrics ward, relative to total DOTs. For frequently prescribed antibiotics, the percentage of consumption for cephalosporins, nitro-imidazole, glycopeptides, penicillins, trimethoprim–sulfonamide, and fluoroquinolones were 5982 DOTs (108%), 2699 DOTs (48.7%), 1970 DOTs (35.6%), 766 DOTs (13.8%), 646 DOTs (11.7%) and 632 DOTs (11.4%), respectively, relative to total DOTs (Table 4).

    The trends of DOT/1000BD over time were shown a small decrease in the 1st, 5th, and 10th week and an increase in the 2nd, 6th and last 2 weeks. But a similar pattern was seen during the 3rd and 4th week, followed by a sharp increase between the 6th and 10th week of the study duration (Fig. 1).

  2. B.

    Antibiotics use patterns based on EML AWaRe classification

    Cephalosporins were the most commonly used class of antibiotics (93.9%). The most commonly used specific antibiotics in JMC were ceftriaxone (86.7%), Metronidazole (38.6%), vancomycin (15%), and azithromycin (8.6%) across the study duration (Table 5). The indicator level of antibiotics use for “Access” group antibiotics was 34% in this study based on both the World Health Organization (WHO 2019) Essential Medicine List (EML) and the Ethiopian Essential Medicines List (EEML 2020) recommendations (Fig. 2).

    In this study, two-thirds (66%) of the antibiotics used in JMC wards were from the “Watch” group as WHO 2019 EML AWaRe groups and more than half (57.6%) based on EEML 2020 AWaRe Classification. The setting has not had “Reserve” group antibiotics as WHO 2019 EML AWaRe Classification despite the high use of “Watch” groups. But 8.4% of “Reserve” group antibiotics were used in JMC as EEML 2020 AWaRe Classification (Table 5).

Table 4 The rates of antibiotics consumption by ward types, patient demographics, the purpose of use, and types of antibiotics used among hospitalized adult patients at JMC (n = 360)
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Trends of antibiotics consumption at JMC wards among adult hospitalized patients in DOT/1000BD during the study duration (n = 360)

Full size image
Table 5 Class of antibiotics and percentage of antibiotics used among hospitalized patients in JMC during the study period based on EML AWaRe classification (n = 360)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Antibiotics use patterns in JMC wards according to Essential Medicine List (EML) AWaRe classification as compared to WHO standards (n = 360)

Full size image

Discussion

Excessive antibiotics exposure lead to a complex relationship between antibiotic resistance and irrational antibiotics use [24]. Thus, knowing the extent of antibiotics exposure, patterns of antibiotic use and identifying risk groups can be helpful to prevent the occurrence of inappropriate antibiotics usage and its consequences. A given adult hospitalized patient with a bacterial infection diagnosis was exposed to one to ten antibiotics with a mean of greater than two in study setting. This finding is almost similar with study conducted in different Referral Hospitals of Ethiopia [16, 25, 26].

In this study, the consumption rates of antibiotics were 120.9 DOT/100BD in Internal Medicine, 105.1 DOT/100BD in Surgery, and 91.8 DOT/100BD in Gynecology/Obstetrics ward. The difference between wards indicates there was high antibiotics exposure (DOT) in the medical and surgical ward with equal risk to be exposed (bed-days). The overall rate of antibiotics consumption was 111/100BD across study duration. This finding is in line with the study conducted in Belgium, which showed 1232 DOT/1000BD [27]. But result of current study is higher than reports from different parts of the USA [28, 29] and reports from California that reported 436–509 DOT/1000BD [30]; and lower than a study done in Ethiopia, which reported 1549 DOT/1000BD [22]. This discrepancy might be due to differences in time, study designs, settings, and treatment modalities or/and prophylaxis protocol used in hospitals.

Based on the present study, the indicator level of “Access” group antibiotics was 34% in a setting which is too low compared to WHO Essential Medicine List AWaRe Classification standard, at least 60% of institutional antibiotics consumption [2]. This finding is in line with the global point prevalence survey conducted in 69 countries in 664 hospitals that resulted in the regional “Access” antibiotics use ranged from 28.4% in West and Central Asia to 57.7% in Oceania [31], and 34.5% in four developing countries [32].

Rapid increases in the “Watch” group antibiotic use, particularly in developing countries like Ethiopia, are a big challenge in antimicrobial stewardship [10]. The current study showed that nearly two-thirds (66%) of antibiotics used were from the “Watch” group antibiotics. This finding is comparable to the survey that reported 66.1% in West and Central Asia [31], and 64.4% in four low and middle-income countries [32]. High consumption of third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone (86.7%) in the study area might be a possible reason for the high volume of their use. Thus, this high antibiotics consumption needs the implementation of ASP in health facilities to ensure rational “Watch” group antibiotic use [12].

This study indicated the commonly prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone (86.7%), metronidazole (38.6%), vancomycin (15%), and azithromycin (8.6%) based on the frequency of specific drugs used among study participants. Cephalosporins were the most commonly used class of antibiotics (93.9%). In comparison, the study from northern Nigeria reported that cephalosporins represented one-third of antibiotics used [33], and this class of antibiotics accounted for 67.2% in Lahore, Pakistan [34], and they are highly consumed in different parts of Ethiopia [16, 25, 26, 35]. The extensive use of third-generation cephalosporins like ceftriaxone has been a focus of study in Ethiopian health facilities including JMC [25, 26, 36].

Limitations of the study

Unlike the previous works, this study was prospective observational study. This makes the study a timely, relevant and comprehensive in the investigation of the facts regarding antibiotics utilization patterns among adult hospitalized patients. Despite it was a prospective study, this study had several limitations. First, it was conducted in a single hospital. Practice patterns and antibiotics resistance patterns may vary among hospitals and so, this may limit generalizability of the study. Second, most of the diagnoses were clinical and cultures were not accessible most of the time. Third, this study assess the trends of antibiotics use among hospitalized adult patients by descriptive statistics and did not address the factors that could be related to the increase in antibiotic use in hospitals. Finally, there was limited data that was conducted using a similar study design to compare the findings.

Conclusions

A higher antibiotic exposure and consumption was frequently observed among adult hospitalized patients in the study area. There was a rapid increase in “Watch” group antibiotics use and about two-thirds of the prescribed antibiotics were from this group. The third-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly used class of antibiotics. Generally, this study will provide information on antibiotics utilization patterns among hospitalized adult patients in Jimma Medical Center, Southwestern Ethiopia, and identify targets (“Watch” and “Reserve” group antibiotics) for better antibiotics utilization in antimicrobial stewardships that prevent antibiotics misuse in health facilities. It will also serve as an insight for the development of hospital guidelines, essential medicines lists, and formularies in study area and beyond.

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this study can be accessible upon request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

AMR:

Antimicrobial resistance

ASP:

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

BD:

Bed-days

DOT:

Days of therapy

EML:

Essential Medicine List

EEML:

Ethiopian Essential Medicine List

GYN/OBS:

Gynecology/Obstetrics

JMC:

Jimma Medical Center

WHO:

Word Health Organization

References

  1. Pires D, de Kraker MEA, Tartari E, Abbas M, Pittet D. ‘Fight antibiotic resistance-It’s in your hands’: call from the World Health Organization for 5th May 2017. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(12):1780–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Organization WH. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes in health-care facilities in low-and middle-income countries: a WHO practical toolkit. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. 2019(Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO):30–60.

  3. Morehead MS, Scarbrough C. Emergence of global antibiotic resistance. Prim Care Clin Off Pract. 2018;45(3):467–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell BG, Schellevis F, Stobberingh E, Goossens H, Pringle M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hay SI, Rao PC, Dolecek C, Day NPJ, Stergachis A, Lopez AD, et al. Measuring and mapping the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):78–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Abushaheen MA, Muzaheed, Fatani AJ, Alosaimi M, Mansy W, George M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance, mechanisms and its clinical significance. Dis Mon. 2020;66(6):100971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tillotson GS, Zinner SH. Burden of antimicrobial resistance in an era of decreasing susceptibility. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15(7):663–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sulis G, Adam P, Nafade V, Gore G, Daniels B, Daftary A, et al. Antibiotic prescription practices in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(6):e1003139-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayukekbong JA, Ntemgwa M, Atabe AN. The threat of antimicrobial resistance in developing countries: causes and control strategies. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6(1):47–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein EY, Milkowska-Shibata M, Tseng KK, Sharland M, Gandra S, Pulcini C, et al. Assessment of WHO antibiotic consumption and access targets in 76 countries, 2000–15: an analysis of pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):107–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mboya EA, Sanga LA, Ngocho JS. Irrational use of antibiotics in the Moshi Municipality Northern Tanzania: a cross sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;31:165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Akpan MR, Isemin NU, Udoh AE, Ashiru-Oredope D. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in African countries: a systematic literature review. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:317–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernabé KJ, Langendorf C, Ford N, Ronat J-B, Murphy RA. Antimicrobial resistance in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(5):629–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Irek EO, Amupitan AA, Aboderin AO, Obadare TO. A systematic review of healthcare-associated infections in Africa: an antimicrobial resistance perspective. Afr J Lab Med. 2018;7(2):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Workneh M, Katz MJ, Lamorde M, Cosgrove SE, Manabe YC. Antimicrobial resistance of sterile site infections in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(4):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muhie OA. Antibiotic use and resistance pattern in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Microbiol. 2019;2019:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee C-R, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS, Bae IK, Kim YB, et al. Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: pathogenesis, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and prospective treatment options. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Arega B, Agunie A, Minda A, Mersha A, Sitotaw A, Weldeyohhans G, et al. Guideline recommendations for empirical antimicrobial therapy: an appraisal of research evidence for clinical decision-making in Ethiopia. Infect Dis Ther. 2020;9(3):451–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Demoz GT, Kasahun GG, Hagazy K, Woldu G, Wahdey S, Tadesse DB, et al. Prescribing pattern of antibiotics using WHO prescribing indicators among inpatients in Ethiopia: a need for antibiotic stewardship program. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:2783–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tefera GM, Feyisa BB, Kebede TM. Antimicrobial use-related problems and their costs in surgery ward of Jimma University Medical Center: prospective observational study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Muhie OA. Antibiotic use and resistance pattern in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Microbiol. 2019;2019:2489063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gutema G, Håkonsen H, Engidawork E, Toverud EL. Multiple challenges of antibiotic use in a large hospital in Ethiopia—a ward-specific study showing high rates of hospital-acquired infections and ineffective prophylaxis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gebeyehu E, Bantie L, Azage M. Inappropriate use of antibiotics and its associated factors among urban and rural communities of Bahir Dar City Administration, Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0138179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cantón R, Horcajada JP, Oliver A, Garbajosa PR, Vila J. Inappropriate use of antibiotics in hospitals: the complex relationship between antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2013;31:3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abrha S, Assefa R, Molla F, Melkam W, Assen A, Mulugeta A. Antibiotics utilization and their cost in Ayder Referral Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia. Glob J Med Res. 2015;15(1):2249–58.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gebretekle GB, Haile Mariam D, Abebe Taye W, Mulu Fentie A, Amogne Degu W, Alemayehu T, et al. Half of prescribed antibiotics are not needed: a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship intervention and clinical outcomes in a Referral Hospital in Ethiopia. Front Public Health. 2020;8:109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. De Bus L, Gadeyne B, Steen J, Boelens J, Claeys G, Benoit D, et al. A complete and multifaceted overview of antibiotic use and infection diagnosis in the intensive care unit: results from a prospective four-year registration. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):241–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodman K, Cosgrove S, Pineles L, Magder L, Anderson DJ, Ashley ED, et al. Significant regional differences in antibiotic use across 576 US hospitals and 11,701,326 million admissions, 2016–2017. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;41(S1):51–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baggs J, Fridkin SK, Pollack LA, Srinivasan A, Jernigan JA. Estimating national trends in inpatient antibiotic use among US hospitals from 2006 to 2012. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(11):1639–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stenehjem E, Hyun DY, Septimus E, Yu KC, Meyer M, Raj D, et al. Antibiotic stewardship in small hospitals: barriers and potential solutions. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(4):691–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pauwels I, Versporten A, Drapier N, Vlieghe E, Goossens H, network tG-P. Hospital antibiotic prescribing patterns in adult patients according to the WHO Access, Watch and Reserve classification (AWaRe): results from a PPS survey in 69 countries. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(6):1614–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ingelbeen B, Koirala KD, Verdonck K, Barbé B, Mukendi D, Thong P, et al. Antibiotic use prior to seeking medical care in patients with persistent fever: a cross-sectional study in four low- and middle-income countries. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abubakar U. Antibiotic use among hospitalized patients in northern Nigeria: a multicenter point-prevalence survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Saleem Z, Saeed H, Hassali MA, Godman B, Asif U, Yousaf M, et al. Pattern of inappropriate antibiotic use among hospitalized patients in Pakistan: a longitudinal surveillance and implications. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):188–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Fenta T, Engidawork E, Amogne W, Berha AB. Evaluation of current practice of antimicrobial use and clinical outcome of patients with pneumonia at a tertiary care hospital in Ethiopia: a prospective observational study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1):e0227736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tefera GM, Feyisa BB, Kebede TM. Antimicrobial use-related problems and their costs in surgery ward of Jimma University Medical Center: prospective observational study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):0216770–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Firstly, we would like to give special thanks to all our friends for their kindness and moral supports through proposal development to finalizing this research. Secondly, we appreciate the data collectors who showed the utmost effort in acquiring appropriate information. In addition, we want to give special gratitude to the study participants and all staff members of the Jimma Medical Center for their cooperation to during data collection.

Funding

The authors did not receive any fund for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 235, Harar, Ethiopia

    Mesay Dechasa

  2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Institute of Health Sciences, Jimma University, PO. Box 378, Jimma, Ethiopia

    Legese Chelkeba & Tsegaye Melaku

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Unit, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

    Amente Jorise

  4. Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia

    Birbirsa Sefera

Authors
  1. Mesay Dechasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Legese Chelkeba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amente Jorise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Birbirsa Sefera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tsegaye Melaku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MD is principal author responsible for designing the study, data collection and analysis and interpretation of findings. LC and MD are responsible for conception of the research idea. MD, LC, AJ, BS and TM participated in study design, analysis and interpretation of the findings. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mesay Dechasa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical clearance was obtained from the Institution Review Board (IRB) of Jimma University, Institute of Health (Ref. No. IRB000237/2012). In addition, permission was sought from the respective heads of each department to conduct the study. After relevant information was given on the research purpose for participants and patients written consent was obtained before data collection. Confidentiality was secured through coding of the questionnaire without writing the name of patients and they had the right to stop participation in the study at any time.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dechasa, M., Chelkeba, L., Jorise, A. et al. Antibiotics use evaluation among hospitalized adult patients at Jimma Medical Center, southwestern Ethiopia: the way to pave for antimicrobial stewardship. J of Pharm Policy and Pract 15, 84 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-022-00490-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-022-00490-4

Keywords

Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice

ISSN: 2052-3211

Contact us