Skip to main content

Strategies to improve pharmaceutical supply chain resilience under politico-economic sanctions: the case of Iran



Given the impact of politico-economic sanctions on the pharmaceutical supply chain, this study aims to identify practical strategies to improve the resilience of the Iranian supply chain in pharmaceutical procurement under politico-economic sanctions.


This is a qualitative content analysis study conducted in 2018. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using snowball sampling, and saturation was achieved after 18 interviews. Guba and Lincoln's criteria, namely credibility, confirmability, transferability, and dependability, were considered to ensure the validity and transparency of the study. A five-step framework analysis was applied to analyze the data using MAX QDA10.


The results led to the identification of nine main themes and 26 subthemes as strategies to improve the resilience of the pharmaceutical chain. According to the thematic map, some of these strategies have an extra-sectoral character: ‘insurance organizations’, ‘strengthening relations with other countries’, ‘mechanization of the distribution system’, and ‘suppliers and manufacturers’. At the same time, some inter-sectoral strategies can help the pharmaceutical chain maintain its resilience: ‘healthcare management and policy’, ‘exploiting local potential’, ‘pricing’, and ‘integrated health information systems.’ As a strategy, ‘Medical community and consumers’ also plays a crucial role in this regard. According to the subthemes, revisions of health management, more supervision, privatization, clinical policies, strategic purchasing, improvement of the referral system, inter-sectoral cooperation, support of indigenous medicines, rational pricing, insurance system, improvement of medical coverage, and development of electronic prescription should be considered by health systems. Sufficient support for indigenous medication and supervision of the distribution system should be considered by the pharmaceutical industry, taking into account the cooperation between consumers and patients.


Integration of the pharmaceutical supply chain and modern technologies, more attention to business complexity, economic development, intense competition, rapid changes in customer needs, and appropriate relationship between manufacturers, distributors, prescribers, and insurance organizations as purchasers should be considered by policymakers to improve supply chain resilience.


Resilience as a multidisciplinary concept is the ability of a system, community, or even an individual not only to absorb a shock but to adapt by changing its characteristics and improve its readiness to reduce the negative impact of future shocks and impending risks [1]. Resilience is considered the most important and strategic issue for healthcare systems in general and the pharmaceutical supply chain, in particular, to respond to external shocks [2]. In a scoping review, a comprehensive framework for the resilience of the whole healthcare system was presented. According to this theoretical framework, six main issues can influence the health system's resilience: leadership and governance, information, financing, health workforce, service delivery, and medical products such as drugs and medical devices [3].

Given the emphasis on the role of pharmaceuticals on the resilience of health systems, resilience provides the opportunity for the pharmaceutical supply chain to return to its initial position or even to a more optimal position than in the past. Moreover, it can bring about the ability to identify threats to predict the possible losses or defects and head off their recurrence [4].

Resilience in pharmaceutical supply chains is a formidable challenge in almost all countries [5]. Furthermore, it has been proven that any flaw in the pharmaceutical supply chain can lead to catastrophic consequences such as the death or disability of patients [6]. Against this backdrop, it is necessary to identify and categorize the factors contributing to the vulnerability of the pharmaceutical supply chain. Generally speaking, factors that can lead to supply chain disruption can be categorized into three main dimensions: economic, manufacturing, and legal challenges [7]. At the same time, evidence shows environmental forces can also make additional uncertainty in the management of medicine supply chains [8].

In addition to recognizing the disruptive factors, several strategies have been proposed to improve pharmaceutical supply chain resilience, including company commitment to additional production, maintaining safety stock, and strengthening supply chain breakpoints [9]. Information technology, organizational structures, regulatory affairs, and management commitment are also mentioned as other strategies [10]. Although these strategies are consistently focused on manufacturing companies, they can be applied to maintain the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain, too [11].

As is often the case with macroeconomic crises or instability, politico-economic sanctions imposed on some underdeveloped or developing countries would seriously affect the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain and make it more vulnerable to internal or external changes [12]. Politico-economic sanctions can also lead to an economic crisis, especially in low- or middle-income countries with poor infrastructure. These destructive effects are more pronounced in the health system and people’s access to medicines and medical devices [13]. Although medicines and medical equipment are purportedly exempt from politico-economic sanctions, patient's access to vital drugs and medical equipment is severely impacted due to transportation barriers, cash transfer challenges, and investment restrictions [14].

Iran is a middle-income country with a population of approximately 80 million that has gone through different phases of crippling and relentless politico-economic sanctions imposed by the United States (US) and European Union (UN) since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, with the situation worsening since November 2018 following the US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Actions (JCPOA) agreement. This has significantly affected Iran’s access to some essential medicines. For instance, a report showed that from 2012 to 2015, access to 13 essential therapeutic medicines under 26 pharmaceutical items was restricted [15].

Accordingly, policymakers need to pay enough attention to the far-reaching implications of the politico-economic sanctions for the pharmaceutical supply chain. Therefore, this study aims to determine practical strategies to enhance the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain, focusing on procurement during politico-economic sanctions.


This qualitative content analysis was conducted in 2018 to explore applied strategies to improve pharmaceutical supply chain resilience under politico-economic sanctions against Iran.

For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were conducted with presidents, vice presidents, and heads of Iran's Food and Drug Administration. The interviewees were selected using the purposeful and snowball sampling method. First, we interviewed the vice president of the Vice-Chancellor's Office for Food and Drug at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and the department managers; then, we asked them to introduce people interested in this field. We then selected the study participants from well-informed individuals who were willing to share their opinions. The inclusion criteria were sufficient information, knowledge, and experience about the storage, distribution, and delivery of medicines and the challenges of the pharmaceutical supply chain.

For data collection, individual interviews were conducted with participants, preferably at their workplaces by arrangement. The interviews were conducted in Persian as this is the formal language and mother tongue of all participants. At the beginning of the interviews, general explanations about the aims of the study and the need for confidentiality of information were given verbally. Written informed consent was also obtained from all interviewees, and it was ensured that they could withdraw from the study at any time. Interviews lasted a minimum of 50 min. All interviews were conducted by one of the researchers. They were recorded with the consent of the participants and transcribed within a very short time after completion. Interviews continued until saturation, which was reached after 18 interviews. The saturation level in qualitative studies is when no new concept can emerge, and the latest data added to the previous ones is simply a duplication. Since data collection and data analysis were simultaneous, after 18 individual interviews, the saturation level of the available data was reached, and the process of data collection was interrupted.

In preparing the semi-structured interview guide, a review of the relevant literature was conducted along with an open-ended pilot interview; it was then confirmed by two experts from the Food and Drug Administration, who are affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. In addition, the validity of the interview guide was confirmed after conducting two pilot interviews with participants.

To increase the accuracy and precision of the study, four criteria developed by Guba and Lincoln were considered, including credibility, confirmability, transferability, and reliability [16]. To increase the credibility of the study, long-term participation and continuous observation were used so that the researchers were fully involved in the study, appropriate communication was established with the participants, and general concepts that emerged during the study were accepted. In addition, interviews and reviews of the related literature were integrated to accomplish this purpose. To increase the confirmability of the findings, coded data were presented to the participants to verify their accuracy. The transferability of the study results was confirmed by explaining the conditions of the informed study participants and the interview method in an understandable manner. An attempt was also made to fully select the participants according to the study's objectives and our primary inclusion criteria. The data were analyzed simultaneously in parallel with data collection to help the researchers be fully informed about the principles of theoretical research. To increase the reliability of the study findings, the concepts, themes, and audio and textual information were coded. To ensure this, two members of the research team analyzed the content individually. They discussed the themes to reach a consensus in case of disagreement. When the coding process was complete, all initial codes were discussed by all research team members who had no conflict of interest regarding the topic. Finally, two qualitative experts finalized the codes.

In addition, data analysis was conducted in five steps. First, the researcher listened to the audio files of the interview sessions, and the transcribed texts were read to identify the data. In the second step and to identify a thematic framework, repetitive ideas were reduced into groups of similar ideas or codes in the process of identification. In other words, through a decreasing process, the researchers grouped the whole text into meaningful units that reflected the answer to the research question. Then the initial codes were extracted from those meaningful units. Third, indexing units or portions of the data associated with a particular code were characterized. As mentioned earlier, the initial codes were then discussed by all members of the research team and two qualitative experts to arrive at the final codes. In the fourth step, the data were summarized in a table based on the thematic framework, which included the final codes, subthemes, and main themes. Finally, in the fifth step, the data were combined. Then diagrams and interpretations were used to define the concepts, show the relationships between the concepts, specify the nature of the phenomenon, and offer explanations and suggestions [17]. Coding and classification of data were performed using MAX QDA (version 10) software. All transcribed interview content was translated into English for better use of the data analysis software.

This study was approved by the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee (Code: IR. SUMS. REC 0.1397.18779). Informed consent was obtained verbally from all participants.


The results led to identifying nine main themes, 26 subthemes, and several codes related to coping strategies to increase resilience in the pharmaceutical supply chain, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Strategies to increase the pharmaceutical supply chain resilience to sanctions

The main themes included strategies for: ‘health care management and policy’, ‘leveraging local potential’, ‘strengthening relationships with other countries’, ‘pricing’, ‘insurance organizations’, ‘health information system integration’, ‘distribution system mechanization’, ‘suppliers and manufacturers’, and ‘medical community and consumers’.

Strategies for healthcare management and policy

Health policy and management as a strategy to increase the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain in the event of politico-economic sanctions included six subthemes: revising Iran's health management, expanding and strengthening supervision, providing clinical guidelines, delegation and privatization, centralized and strategic purchasing, and properly implementing the GP plan and referral system.

Implementing revisions in Iranian healthcare management to pay more attention to health economics, considering the efficiency of the healthcare system, and developing related plans and programs were highlighted by some interviewees as a strategy to increase the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain to sanctions. In this regard, one of the participants opined that:

“Iran's pharmaceutical and healthcare industry is threatened by many natural and human factors. Therefore, I think all countries need to have preparation and resilience plans to deal with these threats to minimize the damage" [P4].

Some interviewees pointed out that increasing and strengthening oversight was a strategy to increase the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain to sanctions. In this regard, a participant noted:

"There are oversight tools, but how effective they are questionable, and it depends to some extent on the individual and the health system. For example, universities in Iran have a very different range of oversight procedures. In my opinion, in this case, the headquarters of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education need to standardize them more seriously" [P12].

Many respondents highlighted the role of clinical guidelines in improving the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain to sanctions. In this regard, one of the respondents said the following:

"Although clinical guidelines exist in other countries to help doctors provide the right treatment, they are lacking in our country" [P2].

Most respondents also recognized delegation and privatization as a useful strategy to increase the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain to sanctions. For example, one of the participants reiterated that:

"The Ministry of Health and Medical Education must increase the powers and duties of universities and the private sector and delegate them to university circuits, private companies, and cooperatives. The IT department must also monitor the activities and make policies without interference in their practice" [P1].

Almost half the respondents believed that centralized and strategic purchasing could be an effective strategy to increase the pharmaceutical supply chain's resilience to sanctions. In this regard, one of the participants stated that:

"Pharmaceutical operations need an adequate infrastructure in terms of software, human resources, control and monitoring capabilities, and a strong financial structure, such as separate financial accounts" [P10].

In relation to the GP plan and referral system, one of the participants added that:

"If the GP plan is properly implemented, it can be effective; but in the current situation, it just increases medication consumption" [P7].

Strategies for exploiting local potentials

This theme constituted three subthemes: increasing inter-sectoral cooperation, paying more attention to mass media, and leveraging national and religious power and authority.

Several respondents believed that increased inter-sectoral collaboration between the health industry and other sectors could help address sanctions-related issues and make the supply chain more resilient. In this regard, one of the participants said that:

"The authorities must draw up a list of shortcomings and call on universities, the private sector, and, above all, the military to produce medical items and equipment, since they have access to more sophisticated technologies" [P1].

Most of the participants emphasized the role of mass media in improving sanctions-related conditions and creating peace in society. For example, one of the participants affirmed:

"Mass media should report the facts; but unfortunately, managers lack good advisors to solve such problems and increase transparency in society" [P7].

Several participants also indicated that such challenges in the pharmaceutical supply chain could be overcome by relying on national and religious power and authority. In this regard, one of the participants stated that:

"Since we are believers, it is expected that we can solve many problems by relying on our religious and national enthusiasm" [P13].

Strategies for strengthening relationships with other countries

As a strategy to improve pharmaceutical supply chain resilience, relationships with other countries constituted two subthemes: interactions with neighboring countries and health tourism development. Regarding interactions with neighboring countries, one participant said:

"Alliance and cooperation between Islamic countries and other nations and the establishment of a common monetary fund can lead to self-reliance and reduce dependence" [P9].

In addition, regarding the development of health tourism, one of the participants opined that:

"The real value of health services should be taken into account, and further arrangements need to be made with source countries to allow tourists to bring their medicines and equipment that they need" [P8].

Pricing strategies

The process of pharmaceutical pricing as a strategy to improve the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain included two subthemes: increasing spending on domestic medicines and rationalizing medicine prices.

Most respondents believed that spending on domestic medicines was low and that prices should be increased. In this regard, one of the respondents added that:

"At this point, the government provides managed foreign exchange for imported commodities, but free-market agents finance other production costs. Therefore, it is expected that the government will then set drug prices based on actual costs rather than on managed foreign exchange [P3].

All the respondents were sure that rationalization of drug prices is a good strategy. For example, one of the participants said that:

"If the government acts logically in rationalizing drug prices and makes it much more real, manufacturing companies will spontaneously shift to production and reduce the need for imports" [P2].

Strategies for insurance organizations

Three subthemes, namely strengthening the insurance system, removing unnecessary drugs from the list of insurance benefits, and transforming insurance into an industry, were coded for this item.

Accordingly, most respondents acknowledged that increasing insurance coverage and strengthening the insurance system could effectively increase the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain. In this regard, one of the respondents added that:

"Currently, not all people benefit from insurance coverage. I think insurance should become mandatory for all. Also, supplementary insurance is passive and needs to cover excess layers" [P14].

Some interviewees mentioned the need to replace drugs with cheaper alternatives as an effective strategy to improve the resilience of the pharmaceutical supply chain. For example, one participant stated that:

"The authorities should remove expensive drugs from the insurance system and increase insurance coverage for commonly used drugs" [P2].

A few respondents also believed it was necessary to transform insurance into an industry and conduct research activities and cost-effectiveness studies. For example, one of the respondents believed that:

"In our country, insurance does not function as an industry, and it is just like a fund to keep the money. Unfortunately, in terms of the aging population, insurance organizations are going bankrupt, and we need to use tried and tested methods to get to the bottom of this problem" [P10].

Strategies for integrating the health information system

The integrated health information system included two subthemes: electronic health records and electronic prescribing.

Regarding the electronic health record, one of the participants said that:

"Currently, our information is not sufficient and integrated, so the more access we have to patient information, the more effectively we can deliver treatments. It is also of the utmost importance to create electronic health records and link them to governmental and private insurance organizations" [P9].

Regarding electronic prescribing, one of the participants added that:

"Proper implementation of electronic health records can actually reduce the treatment burden in Iran. However, infrastructures such as the high-speed Internet in rural areas or alternative plans and programs in the event of power outages should be considered" [P2].

Strategies for mechanizing the distribution system

Tracking medicines and monitoring pharmacies and distributors were analyzed as two subthemes that can make the pharmaceutical supply chain more resilient.

Specifically, all respondents emphasized the mechanization of the distribution system and believed that pharmaceutical products need to be tracked and controlled from the moment they are manufactured or imported into the country. In this regard, one of the respondents said that:

"The national distribution center must be equipped with a tracking system for the distribution of drugs; this will solve many of the problems through the mechanization of the integrated distribution system and determining the exact number of each drug in every corner of the country" [P8].

Regarding the supervision of pharmacies and distributors, one of the participants said that:

"Besides increasing the efficiency of the supply chain, reducing the number of distributors can also significantly affect the level of control over them" [P4].

Strategies regarding the role of suppliers and manufacturers

This main theme included two subthemes, namely providing quality medicines and increasing production and exports.

In relation to high-quality medicines, one of the participants said that:

"The Ministry of Health and Medical Education must evaluate in vivo and in vitro raw materials. However, most of the assessments are quantitative in nature and only check whether the drug dose is given or not, but the effects of the drugs on the patient's body are not assessed" [P5].

Regarding increasing production and export, one of the participants also affirmed:

"Fortunately, there is good capacity and potential in the country, and we are equipped with human capital and intellectual resources to take advantage of this opportunity to increase production and export, especially in the area of high-tech drugs" [P2].

Strategies regarding the role of the medical community and consumers

This main theme included four subthemes: medical community information, alternative medicines and methods, brand loyalty, and consumer–patient collaboration.

Accordingly, most respondents believed that the medical community should be informed of the prescription of alternatives. In this regard, one of the participants said that:

"There are quite a number of alternatives to imported drugs and supplements in the country, but prescribers do not know about their differences and ingredients. Given their exorbitant prices, prescribing foreign drugs can be thoughtless and insensitive. I think we need to provide more information to the medical community in this regard" [P1].

Regarding the use of alternative medicines and methods, one participant added:

"We need to move toward using alternative means for treatments. We also need to have alternative protocols" [P8].

Regarding the role of providers in the lack of brand loyalty, one of the participants said that:

"It seems that physicians' loyalty to a brand should be based on scientific evidence as well as the quality of medicines, but brand orientation is based solely on advertising and marketing by pharmaceutical representatives" [P10].

All the respondents similarly believed in the role of the patient and consumer in rationalizing the use of medicines. In this regard, one of the participants added that:

"The flow of movement should be towards the rational use of medicines by patients. So I think we need to build and promote a culture of rational use of medicines" [P3].

A thematic map was created to better illustrate the information and highlight the most representative themes (Fig. 1). According to Fig. 1, some of these strategies have an extra-sectoral character, such as 'insurance organizations', 'strengthening relations with other countries', 'mechanization of the distribution system', and 'suppliers and manufacturers.' At the same time, some inter-sectoral strategies can help the pharmaceutical chain to maintain its resilience. These strategies include 'health management and policy', 'exploiting local potential', 'pricing', and 'integrated health information system'. As a strategy, 'Medical community and consumers' also plays an important role in this area.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Thematic map of the study


The findings of this study revealed strategies to improve resilience and address the challenges of the pharmaceutical supply chain under politico-economic sanctions. These strategies would enable the pharmaceutical supply chain to be more resilient at both national and industrial levels. This fundamentally helps maintain pharmaceutical services' availability at a high level, leading to a satisfied community. Indeed, resilience offers the pharmaceutical supply chain a greater opportunity to reconfigure itself as the environment changes.

As mentioned earlier, healthcare management and policy would be a powerful tool to respond to environmental changes. More specifically, the negative effects of sanctions can be mitigated by adopting appropriate policies. Cuba is a good case in point. Adopting appropriate pharmaceutical supply chain policies has managed to mitigate the negative effects of sanctions over time [18]. It goes without saying that health policies need to be reformed for a health system to find the best way to respond to market needs [19]. Such a policy illuminates all activities with a greater focus on drug policy to ensure that society can meet its drug needs. More specifically, reliance on local potentials, if well formulated, would provide the country with a high level of resilience in the pharmaceutical supply chain. This is essentially through increased added value in the supply chain with less cost and more productivity. Such an approach has been shown to significantly minimize the risk of drug scarcity and access in the pharmaceutical supply chain over the last decade [20]. More importantly, attention to local potentials creates a virtuous cycle that helps build more capabilities over time to cope with imposed constraints [21]. This view is entirely applicable in a country with a large population and a highly recognized human capital.

It should be noted that investing in local capacity does not rule out the potential in neighboring countries; rather, this capacity is a very cost-effective tool to ensure resilience in a supply chain [22]. Therefore, as participants emphasized, policies must be formulated to benefit from both local and neighboring capacity. This is particularly important in the case of Iran, as the country is located in the Middle East region and has good access to the fourth corner of the world [23].

As for the pricing strategy, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed it as an effective tool to address the challenges of sanctions against medicines by rationalizing prices [24]. This contributes significantly to the rational use of medicines, leading to a reduction in wastage of medicines, especially those subsidized by the government. For example, sensible pricing can potentially discourage self-medication. The money saved through this policy would be spent on other prescribed drugs to protect the population from high costs. This policy is well supported if insurance companies remove unnecessary drugs from the positive list and exclude the expensive drugs that do not clinically add value to the patients. To this end, such companies should apply an appropriate rationing system to achieve clinical efficiency, safety, and access [25]. More importantly, an integrated health information system wonderfully enables the healthcare system to provide the right medicines to the right people [26]. This is mainly done by providing electronic health records and electronic prescriptions. Finally, the medical profession and consumers play a critical role in providing resilience in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Physicians can change prescribing behavior and provide alternative medications that are cost-effective and reduce patient co-payments. Physicians are key players in the healthcare system as they are in the right position to convince patients to follow the recommended path. On the other hand, consumers would be well informed about their situation and the alternatives offered to them. Building mutual trust is a very powerful tool in ensuring respect and de-escalating conflicts.


This study has some limitations. First, it is better to triangulate the qualitative data obtained through the interviews with other types of possible data, such as the national documents and reports. Second, the views of the community, producers, and traders may enrich the results, which should be considered in further studies.


According to the present study, some strategies were found to make the pharmaceutical supply chain more resilient under politico-economic sanctions. In this regard, policymakers need to consider the integration of pharmaceutical supply chain activities with modern technologies, especially in the case of large-scale pharmaceutical industries, attention to business complexity, economic development, intense competition, rapid changes in customer needs, and appropriate relationship between manufacturers, distributors, prescribers, and insurance organizations as buyers.

Availability of data and materials

They are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.


  1. van de Pas R, Ashour M, Kapilashrami A, Fustukian S. Interrogating resilience in health systems development. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(suppl_3):iii88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yaroson EV, Breen L, Hou J, Sowter J. Resilience strategies and the pharmaceutical supply chain: the role of agility in mitigating drug shortages. In: Pharmaceutical supply chains-medicines shortages. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 249–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Fridell M, Edwin S, Von Schreeb J, Saulnier DD. Health system resilience: what are we talking about? A scoping review mapping characteristics and keywords. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(1):6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alqudah S, Shrouf H, Suifan T, Alhyari S. A moderated mediation model of lean, agile, resilient, and green paradigms in the supply chain. Int J Sup Chain Mgt. 2020;9(4):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatia G, Lane C, Wain A, editors. Building resilience in supply chains. World Economic Forum; 2013.

  6. Fox ER, Sweet BV, Jensen V, editors. Drug shortages: a complex health care crisis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014.

  7. Pauwels K, Simoens S, Casteels M, Huys I. Insights into European drug shortages: a survey of hospital pharmacists. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3): e0119322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghatari AR, Mehralian G, Zarenezhad F, Rasekh HR. Developing a model for agile supply: an empirical study from Iranian pharmaceutical supply chain. Iran J Pharm Res. 2013;12(Suppl):193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aigbogun O, Ghazali Z, Razali R. A framework to enhance supply chain resilience the case of Malaysian pharmaceutical industry. Glob Bus Manag Res. 2014;6(3):219–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mehralian G, Moosivand A, Emadi S, Asgharian R. Developing a coordination framework for pharmaceutical supply chain: using analytical hierarchy process. Int J Logist Syst Manag. 2017;26(3):277–93.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chabner BA. Drug shortages—a critical challenge for the generic-drug market. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(23):2147–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdollahiasl A, Jaberidoost M, Farshchi A. PHP13 affordability of antibacterial medicines in Iran during 2001–2010. Value Health. 2012;15(7):A611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kheirandish M, Rashidian A, Kebriaeezade A, Cheraghali AM, Soleymani F. A review of pharmaceutical policies in response to economic crises and sanctions. J Res Pharm Pract. 2015;4(3):115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheraghali AM. Impacts of international sanctions on Iranian pharmaceutical market. Daru. 2013;21(1):64–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aloosh M, Salavati A, Aloosh A. Economic sanctions threaten population health: the case of Iran. Public Health. 2019;169:10–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Lincoln DYS, editor. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 1994. p. 105–17.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van der Stuyft P, De Vos P, Hiderbrand K. USA and shortage of food and medicine in Cuba. Lancet. 1997;349(9048):363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. How to develop and implement a national drug policy. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Homedes N, Ugalde A. Improving access to pharmaceuticals in Brazil and Argentina. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(2):123–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Privett N, Gonsalvez D. The top ten global health supply chain issues: perspectives from the field. Oper Res Health Care. 2014;3(4):226–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts MJ, Reich MR. Last mile logistics for essential drugs: the case of Zambia. In: Roberts M, Reich M, editors. Pharmaceutical reform: a guide to improving performance and equity. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2011.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Esmaeillou Y, Asl IM, Tabibi SJ, Majid CA. Identifying factors affecting the pharmaceutical supply chain management in Iran. Galen Med J. 2017;6(4):346–55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization. Equitable access to essential medicines: a framework for collective action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu X, Li C, Shi Y, Yu M. Pharmaceutical supply chain in China: current issues and implications for health system reform. Health Policy. 2010;97(1):8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chukwu OA, Chukwu U, Lemoha C. Poor performance of medicines logistics and supply chain systems in a developing country context: lessons from Nigeria. J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2018;9(4):289–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This article was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, with grant No. 97-01-07-18779. The authors thank all the participants who took part in this study.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



PB has designed the article and supervised the methodological process, MK and HD have co-supervised the study, ZD and MM have contributed to data collection and data analysis, RR has finalized the analysis and the whole draft of the manuscript, and GM has technically edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramin Ravangard.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee (Code: IR.SUMS.REC.1397.18779). Informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastani, P., Dehghan, Z., Kashfi, S.M. et al. Strategies to improve pharmaceutical supply chain resilience under politico-economic sanctions: the case of Iran. J of Pharm Policy and Pract 14, 56 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: