Skip to main content
Download PDF

Treatment outcomes of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Bahawalpur, Pakistan; a record review

Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice volume 13, Article number: 35 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is limited published data form Pakistan on treatment success rate among extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) patients. The aim of this study was to assess clinical form, treatment outcomes, and identify the factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome among EPTB patients.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at the Chest Disease Unit of the Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Pakistan. Medical records of EPTB patients, registered at the study site from January 1, 2015 to September 30, 2017, were reviewed to obtain the data. Final treatment outcomes among EPTB patients were evaluated in accordance with the standard Word Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome.

Results

A total of 651 EPTB patients were included in the study. Highest proportion of patients had pleural TB (n = 217, 33.3%). Out of the total 651 patients, 463 (71.1%) successfully completed the treatment. Among 177 (27.2%) patients with unfavorable treatment outcome, 10 (1.5%) died, while 165 (25.4%) lost to follow-up the treatment. Lymph node TB (AOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.422, 0.989) and meningeal TB (AOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.065, 4.144) were significantly associated with unfavorable treatment outcome.

Conclusion

The treatment success (favorable outcome) rate among EPTB patients was less than the target (i.e., ≥ 90%) set by the WHO. Highest proportion of patients lost to follow-up during the treatment.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is primarily a disease of the lungs (i.e., pulmonary TB), but can also affect other organs of the body (i.e., extrapulmonary TB) [1]. According to the Global Tuberculosis Report (2018), 10 million people developed TB disease and 1.3 million died (Human Immunodeficiency Virus negative) from this illness in 2017 [2]. Available evidences showed that an increase in the number of newly diagnosed EPTB cases were observed worldwide [1, 3, 4]. In the Eastern Mediterranean Region, the percentage of EPTB case notifications increased from 22.9% in 2014 to 24% in 2017 [2, 4]. Pakistan faced an incidence rate of 267 cases of TB per 100,000 population (all forms TB cases) [2] while the percentage of EPTB cases notified in the country raised from 15.4% in 2012 to 20% in 2017 [2, 4, 5]. Increase in the burden of EPTB in recent years could have a significant impact on the national health resources.

Reporting treatment outcomes among TB patients is one of the major indicators to evaluate the performance of national tuberculosis control program (NTP) [6]. The International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease and the World Health Organization (WHO) jointly published recommendations to standardize the reporting of treatment outcomes among TB patients. Though, these recommendations are aimed at pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) but are also used for EPTB [7]. In recent years, countries such as Nigeria (52.3%), Ethiopia (79.2%) and India (78.1%) documented suboptimal treatment success rates among EPTB patients [8,9,10]. In contrast, similar studies from Bhutan (90%) and India (90.5%) reported better treatment success rates [11, 12]. Earlier studies reported age, gender, type of patient, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status and diabetes as most common factors associated with treatment success rate among EPTB patients [7, 11].

In Pakistan, the treatment success rate for TB (all forms) was 94% (2017 cohort) [2]. A few studies from Pakistan reported 60–88% treatment success rate among EPTB patients [13, 14]. Nevertheless, to-date, limited data is available on clinical form and treatment outcomes among EPTB patients. In particular, it remains unclear what are the most common risk factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome among EPTB patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess clinical form, treatment outcomes and identify the factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome among EPTB patients at the Bahawal Victoria Hospital (BVH), Punjab, Pakistan.

Methods

Study design

This was a retrospective record review [15,16,17] of EPTB patients registered at the study site from 2015 to 2017.

Study setting

The study was conducted in the Bahawalpur district of the Punjab province of Pakistan. Bahawalpur is the 12th largest city of Pakistan with an approximate population of 3,333,467 people. There are two public sector tertiary healthcare facilities in Bahawalpur i.e., the BVH and the Civil Hospital. This study was undertaken at the Chest Disease Unit (CDU) of the BVH. The BVH, a 1600 bedded health facility, is a referral tertiary care hospital located in the southern region of the Punjab province of Pakistan. The CDU of the BVH has 8–10 physicians, 5–6 chest specialists and two pharmacists who provide routine care to the patients with chest-related diseases. In addition, TB outdoor clinic has dedicated paramedic staff committed to provide quality care to TB patients. TB outdoor clinic is visited by 35–40 TB patients daily. TB unit in the chest clinic works under the NTP [18].

Presumptive cases of EPTB are often diagnosed on microbiological and/or clinical grounds [19]. After being diagnosed with EPTB, patients are provided with standard anti-TB regimen comprising of isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide (Z) and ethambutol (E) for 2 months followed by isoniazid (H) and rifampin (R) for 4 months (2HRZE/4HR). Re-treatment cases are treated with 3HRZE/6HRE. Duration of treatment in meningeal TB patients may be as long as 20 months. The patients who default form the treatment for more than 4 weeks are contacted via telephone, and traced by a TB-coordinator.

Patients and data collection

The study included all new and retreatment EPTB patients aged ≥15 years diagnosed and registered at the study site from January 1, 2015 to September 30, 2017. During May and June 2018, patient files were reviewed to collect socio-demographic, clinical and treatment-related data on age, sex, distance from the treatment center, body weight, type of patient, site of disease, diagnostic tests and final treatment outcomes [20, 21].

Reporting of treatment outcomes (main outcome variable)

The outcome of TB treatment was reported in accordance with the standard criteria [22]. Treatment failure was defined as, “a patient whose treatment fails based on clinical judgment of the physician, for example, size of lymph node, radiographic findings, colonoscopy etc.” [23,24,25]. Treatment completed was further classified as favorable treatment, whereas treatment failure, died and loss to follow-up were classified as unfavorable treatment outcome [26]. Table 1 outlines the standard definitions of treatment outcomes.

Table 1 Definition of treatment outcomes among extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Data were double entered in EpiData (version 3.1 for entry, EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM, SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Categorical variables were presented as counts and proportions (%). Continuous variables were described as mean and standard deviations (SD). Simple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the dependent variable (i.e., unfavorable treatment outcome) and the selected independent variables. Statistically significant variables in univariate analysis were analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to find the independent factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome. The adjusted odd ratios (AOR) and 95% CI was documented for each variable. The significance of the statistical tests was taken at a p-value of < 0.05.

Note: In this study, “successful treatment outcome” and “favorable treatment outcome” are used interchangeably, and are similar in meaning.

Results

During the study period, a total of 723 EPTB patients were registered at the study site. Out of these, medical records of 72 (10%) patients were not traceable due to assorted reasons. Consequently, 651 patients were included in the study. Among these, 648 (99.5%) were new patients and only 3 (0.5%) were retreatment case. The mean age of the patients was 33.7 (SD = 14.9) years. Close to half of the patients (n = 317; 48.7%) were female (Table 2).

Table 2 Socio-demographic characteristics of extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients registered at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur from 2015 to 2017 (N = 651)
Full size table

With regard to site of infection, highest proportion of patients had pleural TB (n = 217, 33.3%) followed by lymph node TB (n = 170, 26.1%). More than 65% (n = 437; 67.1%) of the patients had their histopathological tests done, while basis of diagnosis was not recorded in 15 (2.3%) patients (Table 3.)

Table 3 Site of infection and diagnostic attributes of extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients registered at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur from 2015 to 2017 (N = 651)
Full size table

Table 4 describes treatment outcomes among EPTB patients. Out of the total 651 patients, 463 (71.1%) completed the treatment (i.e., favorable treatment outcome). Among 177 (27.2%) patients with unfavorable treatment outcome, 10 (1.5%) died and 165 (25.4%) lost to follow-up during the treatment. A small proportion of the patients (n = 11, 1.7%) were not evaluated for the treatment outcome because their final treatment outcomes were not recorded in the medical records.

Table 4 Treatment outcomes among extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients registered at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur from 2015 to 2017 (N = 651)
Full size table

Further analysis of data showed that 20% of the patients with lymphatic TB lost to follow-up the treatment. While, 0.6% of the patients died during treatment. With regard to meningeal TB, 42.1% of the patients lost to follow-up and 2.6% of the patients died during the treatment. Further details on treatment outcomes in relation to patients' age, sex and site of infection could be seen in Supplementary File 1.

In simple logistic regression analysis, the factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome included lymph node TB (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.397, 0.922) and meningeal TB (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.203, 4.605) (Table 5).

Table 5 Factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome among extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients registered at Bahawal Victoria Hospital from 2015 to 2017: simple logistic regression analysis
Full size table

After adjusting the determinants of unfavorable treatment outcome among EPTB patients in univariate analysis, the factors which still remained significantly associated with unfavorable treatment outcome were lymph node TB (AOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.422, 0.989) and meningeal TB (AOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.065, 4.144) (Table 6).

Table 6 Factors associated with unfavorable treatment outcome among extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients registered at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur from 2015 to 2017: multiple logistic regression analysis
Full size table

AOR = Adjusted odds ratio; Model summary (chi square = 10.208, degrees of freedom = 2, p = .006, pseudo R square = .023).

Discussion

Our study findings showed the treatment success rate of 71.1% among the EPTB patients, which is far less than the target (i.e., ≥ 90%) set by the WHO. In the study cohort, more than 25% of the patients lost to follow-up, while 1.5% died during the treatment. Pleural and lymphatic TB were the most common forms of EPTB. Patients with meningeal TB had higher probability of unfavorable outcome, while the patients with lymphatic TB had relatively higher probability of achieving favorable treatment outcome.

A treatment success rate of ≥90% among TB patients is one of the main targets set in the End TB strategy [2]. In this study, treatment success rate among EPTB patients was suboptimal and this is in line with the findings of a previous Pakistani study which reported 60% treatment success rate among EPTB patients [14]. Other studies from high TB burden countries such as Nigeria (52.3%), India (78.1%) and China (76.7%) also reported suboptimal treatment success rates among EPTB patients [8, 9, 27]. The reasons for lower treatment success rate could be non-adherence to anti-TB drugs, potential side effects associated with anti-TB drugs, lack of patient knowledge about the consequence of loss to follow-up, and distance from treatment center [28]. Contrary to our findings, studies conducted in Ethiopia (89.2%) and Bhutan (90%) showed relatively better treatment success rates [12, 29]. This might be associated with better quality of healthcare facilities, political commitment, support from family, friends and healthcare workers, social support, better patient knowledge, and improved adherence to TB treatment [21].

In line with the findings of studies conducted in Cameroon (20%), South Africa (17.2%), Thailand (11%) and Pakistan (15.7%), our study found 25.4% loss to follow-up rate among EPTB patients [17, 30,31,32]. This loss to follow-up rate is substantially higher and needs urgent attention. Potential consequences of loss to follow-up could be treatment failure, relapse, transmission of disease to high risk patients, development of drug resistance, and mortality. A systematic review of studies from developing countries reported lack of patient knowledge about disease, getting bored of pills, longer duration of TB treatment, feeling better after few weeks of treatment, negative attitude of patients towards healthcare workers (HCW), poor patient-HCW relationship, fear of stigmatization, lack of money and social support, and distance from treatment center as main factors associated with loss to follow-up TB treatment [28]. Understanding and minimizing the impact of these factors is important to improve treatment completion rate. Improved patient counseling and awareness of disease, better healthcare facilities and social support to the patients can reduce loss to follow-up treatment.

In our study, the most common types of EPTB were pleural and lymph node TB. This finding is consistent with other published studies [33,34,35]. In multivarite binary logistic regression analysis, patients with meningeal TB had higher chances of unfavorable treatment outcome. This could be due the fact that treatment duration of meningeal TB is longer due to reduced penetration of anti-TB drugs (ethambutol and rifampicin) to cerebrospinal fluid [36, 37]. Consequently, they could have left the treatment earlier (i.e., loss to follow-up) either because they were bored of taking pills or were unaware of the importance of treatment completion [28]. Secondly, due to earlier reasons and complex nature of the disease, the mortality rate may be higher in patients presenting with meningeal TB [38]. Our data support this notion as 42% of the patients with meningeal TB lost to follow-up and 2.6% of the patients died during the treatment. Earlier studies conducted in the United States (US) and Iran also reported meningeal TB to be a risk factor associated with unsuccessful outcome among EPTB [39, 40]. Our findings also showed that probability of unfavorable treatment outcome was less in patients with lymph node TB. This could be attributed to relatively lower loss to follow-up (20%) and death rates (0.6%) in this sub group of patients. A study from the US highlighted better success rate among lymph node TB patients due to lower mortality rate, and this is also evident from our findings [38].

The strength of this study was that we included all patients registered at the study site during the study period and reported outcomes of TB treatment in line with the standard WHO criteria. Similarly, design, methodology and reporting of results followed STROBE guidelines [41]. Therefore, the risk of methodological biasness was minimal. Along with the strengths, there are a few limitations with are innate to any operational research study. First, the findings of this study could not be generalized for whole Pakistan. This is because BVH is one of the main referral hospital in the Southern Punjab and serve complex TB cases from urban and rural areas. The patients from rural areas may have higher probability of loss to follow-up, and this is also evident from our findings. Second, due to incomplete medical records of patients, it was not possible to capture some of the important variables which could have influenced the treatment outcome.

This study has implications for policy and practice. The findings of the study demonstrated that treatment success (favorable treatment outcome) rate among EPTB patients was less than the target set in the End Treatment Strategy which warrants urgent attention. In this study, a large proportion of EPTB patients lost to follow-up. This should be a concern for the policy makers and it necessitates the development and implementation of interventions to minimize treatment interruptions. Moreover, future studies should be conducted to underline the reasons of loss to follow-up. Our study also provided clinicians an opportunity to identify patients who were at higher risk of unfavorable treatment outcome.

Conclusion

Higher proportion of patients had pleural TB followed by lymph node TB. The treatment success rate (favorable outcome) among EPTB patients was 71.1% which is less than the target (i.e., ≥ 90%) set by the WHO in the End TB Strategy. Among the unfavorable treatment outcomes, highest proportion of patients lost to follow-up the treatment. Patients with meningeal TB had higher probability of unfavorable outcomes, while patients with lymph node TB were more likely to achieve favorable treatment outcome.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The ethical clearance of the study was obtained from the Pharmacy Research Ethics Committee (PREC) at the Islamia University of Bahawalpur.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data related to this study may be provided upon receiving reasonable request. Please contact Muhammad Atif at pharmacist_atif@yahoo.com.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2017 2017 [cited 2018 April 10]; Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/.

  2. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. 2018 [cited 2018 October 7]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274453/9789241565646-eng.pdf?ua=1.

  3. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2012 2012 [cited 2018 March 29]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75938/1/9789241564502_eng.pdf.

  4. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2015. 2015 [cited 2018 March 29]; Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/gtbr15_main_text.pdf.

  5. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Reprot 2013. 2013 [cited 2018 March 29]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/91355.

  6. Atif M, et al. Treatment outcome of new smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Penang, Malaysia. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(1):399.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vasankari T, et al. Treatment outcome of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Finland: a cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):399.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Adamu AL, et al. High mortality among tuberculosis patients on treatment in Nigeria: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):170.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma SK, et al. Clinical profile & predictors of poor outcome of adult HIV-tuberculosis patients in a tertiary care Centre in North India. Ind J Med Res. 2014;139(1):154–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tesgaye F, et al. Documentation and treatment outcomes of smear-negative and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Ethiopia. Public Health Act. 2014;4(3):S25–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson C, et al. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes among disadvantaged patients in India. Public Health Act. 2017;7(2):134–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamtsho T, et al. The burden and treatment outcomes of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Bhutan. Public Health Act. 2013;3(1):38–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad T, et al. Treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients under directly observed treatment short course and its determinants in Shangla, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: a retrospective study. Int J Mycobact. 2017;6(4):360–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chandir S, et al. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a retrospective review of 194 cases at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(2):105–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Solliman MA, et al. Treatment outcomes of new smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in north East Libya. Latin Amer J Pharm. 2012;31(4):567–73.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kherad O, et al. Clinical presentation, demographics and outcome of tuberculosis (TB) in a low incidence area: a 4-year study in Geneva, Switzerland. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9(1):217.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Atif M, et al. Analysis of tuberculosis treatment outcomes among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Bahawalpur, Pakistan. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):370.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Atif M, et al. Rights and responsibilities of tuberculosis patients, and the global fund: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0151321.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Improving the diagnosis and treatment of smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis among adults and adolescents: recommendations for HIV-prevalent and resource-constrained settings. 2007 [cited 2018 October 10]; Available from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/tb/pulmonary/en/.

  20. Ditah IC, et al. Monitoring tuberculosis treatment outcome: analysis of national surveillance data from a clinical perspective. Thorax. 2007;63(5):440–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gebrezgabiher G, et al. Treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients under directly observed treatment short course and factors affecting outcome in southern Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective study. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0150560.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization. Definitions and reporting framework for tuberculosis–2013 revision. 2013 [cited 2018 October 8]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/79199/9789241505345_eng.pdf;jsessionid=AD8AFE2DF0B748839F88E78B61A31F28?sequence=1.

  23. Lee JY. Diagnosis and treatment of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2015;78(2):47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammadien H, et al. Patterns, trends and treatment outcomes of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in Sohag, upper Egypt. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2017;66(2):313–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. South Africa. Department of Health. National Tuberculosis Management Guidelines 2014. 2014 [cited 2018 October 8]; Available from: http://www.tbonline.info/media/uploads/documents/ntcp_adult_tb-guidelines-27.5.2014.pdf.

  26. Khan I, et al. Evaluation of treatment outcomes and factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes in multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients in Baluchistan province of Pakistan. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12(6):809–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ai X, et al. Factors associated with low cure rate of tuberculosis in remote poor areas of Shaanxi Province, China: a case control study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):112.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Habteyes Hailu, T., T. Azar, and G.G. Davoud SHOJAEIZADEH, Tuberculosis treatment non-adherence and lost to follow up among TB patients with or without HIV in developing countries: a systematic review. Iranian J Pub Health, 2015;44(1):1.

  29. Berhe G, Enquselassie F, Aseffa A. Treatment outcome of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):537.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kigozi G, et al. Factors influencing treatment default among tuberculosis patients in a high burden province of South Africa. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;54:95–102.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yone EWP, Kengne AP, Kuaban C. Incidence, time and determinants of tuberculosis treatment default in Yaounde, Cameroon: a retrospective hospital register-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000289.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kittikraisak W, et al. Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment default among HIV-infected tuberculosis patients in Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103(1):59–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vorster MJ, et al. Tuberculous pleural effusions: advances and controversies. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(6):981–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Valdés L, et al. Recent epidemiological trends in tuberculous pleural effusion in Galicia, Spain. Eur J Intern Med. 2012;23(8):727–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kruijshaar ME, Abubakar I. Increase in extra pulmonary tuberculosis in England and Wales 1999-2006. Thorax. 2009;64(2):1090–995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaojarern S, et al. Effect of steroids on cerebrospinal fluid penetration of antituberculous drugs in tuberculous meningitis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1991;49(1):6–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marx GE, Chan ED. Tuberculous meningitis: diagnosis and treatment overview. Tuber Res Treat. 2011;2011.

  38. Qian X, et al. Risk factors for extrapulmonary dissemination of tuberculosis and associated mortality during treatment for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kourbatova EV, et al. Risk factors for mortality among patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis at an academic inner-city hospital in the US. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(9):715–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Razmeh S, et al. Acute stroke secondary to tuberculous meningitis: a case report and review of literature. Int J Prev Med. 2017;6(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Von Elm E, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted through the Structured Operational Research and Training Initiative (SORT IT), a global partnership led by the Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases at the World Health Organization (WHO/TDR). The training model is based on a course developed jointly by the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union, Paris, France) and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF, Geneva, Switzerland). The specific SORT IT program that resulted in this publication was implemented by the National Tuberculosis Control Program of Pakistan, through the support of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (The Global Fund, Geneva, Switzerland).

Funding

No funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan

    Muhammad Atif

  2. Research Unit, National TB Control Program, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Razia Fatima

  3. Department of Pharmacy, University of Baluchistan, Quetta, Pakistan

    Nafees Ahmad

  4. Department of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK

    Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar

Authors
  1. Muhammad Atif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Razia Fatima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nafees Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MAT made substantial contribution to conception and design of the study. RF also made contributions to the conception and design of the article. MAT was involved in data collection. MA, NA, ZB and RF made contribution in data analysis and interpretation. MAT drafted the manuscript and RF, NA and ZB critically revised the manuscript. Final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors, and all authors are accountable to the accuracy and integrity of all parts of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Atif.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atif, M., Fatima, R., Ahmad, N. et al. Treatment outcomes of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Bahawalpur, Pakistan; a record review. J of Pharm Policy and Pract 13, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00227-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00227-1

Keywords

Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice

ISSN: 2052-3211

Contact us