Themes | Level 2 codes | Level 1 codes |
---|---|---|
Uncertainties and disagreements regarding to what extent the marketing authorization process can and should be adapted | Current challenges for regulatory authorities are caused by AMR | Regulatory authorities have addressed most structural challenges in marketing authorization |
Current challenges in marketing authorization are due to lack of clinical data | ||
Adaptation to the marketing authorization process causes new challenges | Increased importance of PK/PD | |
Uncertainties of how to use PK/PD data | ||
HTA agencies asking for more clinical data | ||
Balance between addressing AMR and upholding good quality | Continuous work to address the future antibiotic need, need to find new ways to meet new challenges | |
Unacceptable to reduce requirements in the marketing authorization process to address AMR | ||
Regulatory authorities have adapted as much as they can | ||
Increased risk of irresponsible use of antibiotics | Lack of clinical data makes it difficult for physicians to make an informed decision and uphold responsible use | Company holds power over how a drug is used, not forced to consider AMR |
Limited clinical data lead to limited post-approval data | ||
Limited clinical data lead to greater uncertainty regarding the benefit/risk profile of the drug | ||
Adhering to the regulatory authorities’ recommendations can both reduce and increase the risk for irresponsible use | Antibiotics approved with limited clinical data risks incentivizing off-lable use | |
Regulatory authorities clear on circumstances for approval and intended use | ||
Limited jurisdiction and clear stakeholder perception | Companies and clinicians have the final say in how an antibiotic is used, not under the control of regulatory authorities and HTA agencies | |
The increasing population-level spread of resistant strains means that benefit/risk assessment of new antibiotics will vary over time | Marketing authorization based on limited clinical data results in increased safety risks | Lack of clinical data leads to uncertainties regarding benefit/risk profile |
Smaller safety databases lead to uncertainties regarding the safety profile | ||
Using an antibiotic in a limited population leads to limited post-approval data | ||
Accepting a higher level of uncertainties regarding the safety profile, if benefits overweigh potential safety risks, does not mean there is an increased acceptance for safety risks | Benefit and risk are relative to the situation | |
Lack of effective antibiotics targeting unmet needs, including AMR, is a threat to public health | Delay in antibiotic R&D, need to act now before resistant bacteria have spread too much | |
Continuous work to address the future antibiotic need, need to find new ways to meet new challenges | ||
Adjustments to regulatory requirements for antibiotics misaligned with evidence needs for determining value with HTAs | Regulatory authorities actively work to address AMR | Regulatory authorities have adapted as much as they can |
Different objectives | HTA agencies assess cost-effectiveness, regulatory authorities assess benefit/risk | |
Regulatory authorities consider it problematic that HTA agencies demands additional clinical data in cases, where this is difficult to obtain | HTA agencies ask for different data than regulatory authorities | |
HTA agencies ask for proof of superiority | ||
If the demand for clinical data is too high companies will exit the field of antibiotic R&D | ||
Disagreement between regulatory authorities and HTA agencies whether HTAs are causing barriers to get new antibiotics to market | Targeting an unmet medical need increases the HTA-score | |
HTA does not look at public health impact of a resistant bacteria | ||
Antibiotic prices are too low | ||
Limited experience with HTAs of antibiotics | Few countries conducting HTAs | |
Few new antibiotics have reached the market in recent years resulting in limited experience conducting HTAs for new antibiotics | ||
Different interpretations of ‘novelty’ and ‘need’ translates to differing views on what kinds of antibiotics are urgently needed | Need for a broad armamentarium | Need for antibiotics to treat hospitalized patients suffering from infections caused by multidrug resistant bacteria |
Need for new small-spectrum antibiotics to reduce development of AMR in the population at large | ||
Novelty has multiple meanings | Drugs can be novel based on its own characteristics or based on the circumstances of the situation it is being used in | |
Unmet need is a dynamic term | Different needs in different regions | |
Size of patient groups | ||
Unclear when additional antibiotics in the same class no longer adds value |