- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Approval, reimbursement and pricing of high-cost cancer medicines in Australia
© Vitry 2015
- Published: 5 October 2015
- European Medicine Agency
- Price Strategy
- Australian Government
- Average Annual Growth Rate
- Fund Decision
Australian government expenditures on chemotherapy medicines are increasing faster than any other area of health care with an average annual growth rate of 63% from 2009/10 to 2013/14. Funding decisions on new, high-cost cancer medicines are challenging because of insufficient evidence on benefits and risks of new cancer medicines and high prices requested by pharmaceutical companies. We reviewed the current approval, reimbursement and pricing strategies for cancer medicines and the development of new regulatory and funding pathways in Australia.
A review of government documents from websites of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in Europe.
Of all cancer medicines approved by at least one of three regulatory agencies, the FDA, the TGA and the EMA, between 2010 and 2013, Australia authorised the fewest number of indications for cancer medicines (n=54, 59%) compared to the UK (n= 72, 78%) and the US (n=68, 74%). Australia approved a higher number of indications for funding (n=21, 39%) than NICE in the UK (n=14, 19%). Delays in approval and funding are multifactorial and partly explained by time required for price negotiations. In May 2015, there were special pricing arrangements in place for 23 new cancer medicines including all tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. Since 2010, four cancer medicines were approved for funding via a managed entry scheme requiring submission of more conclusive evidence of cost-effectiveness.
Australia has implemented rigorous methodologies for assessing the value-pricing of new medicines while developing new managed entry pathways. The confidential nature of the agreements between the Australian government and pharmaceutical companies limits the evaluation of the outcomes with regards to pricing of cancer medicines compared with other countries.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.