Skip to main content

Table 5 The participants’ rating of various aspects of the training (N = 26)

From: Developing and evaluating training for pharmacists to offer a pharmacy-led public health service in primary care

Statements

Excellent

Good

Average

Below average

Poor

1

2

3

4

5

Frequency (n)/percentage (%)

Training and training materials

 How would you rate your overall training experience

10 / 38.5

15/ 57.7

1/ 3.8

–

–

 How would you rate the training materials provided prior to the training?

19/ 73.1

7/ 26.9

–

–

–

 How would you rate the structure of the training materials delivered during the session?

18 /69.2

7/ 26.9

1/ 3.8

–

–

 The visual aids and handouts provided

19/ 73.1

6/ 23.1

1/ 3.8

–

–

 The video provided

16/ 61.5

7/ 26.9

2/ 7.7

1/ 3.8

–

 The role-playing

13/ 50

8/ 30.8

4/ 15.4

1/ 3.8

 

 The case studies

11/ 42.3

13/ 50

2/ 7.7

–

–

 The group discussion

10/ 38.5

12/ 46.2

3/ 11.5

1/ 3.8

–

Venue and equipment

 The venue used for the type of training provided was sufficient

11/ 42.3

13/ 50

2/ 7.7

–

–

 The venue meets my expectations

12/ 46.2

12/ 46.2

2/ 7.7

–

–

 The equipment was working properly

15/ 57.7

8/ 30.8

3/ 11.5

–

–

Tutor

 Tutor’s overall skills

22/ 84.6

2/ 7.7

1/ 3.8

1/ 3.8

-

 Tutor’s professional performance

20/ 76.9

4/ 15.4

1/ 3.8

1/ 3.8

-

 Tutor’s expertise

17/ 65.4

7/ 26.9

1/ 3.8

–

1/ 3.8

 Tutor’s clarity

15/ 57.7

10/ 38.5

–

1/ 3.8

–

 Tutor’s preparation of the sessions

24/ 92.3

1/ 3.8

–

1/ 3.8

–

 Tutor’s time management

15/ 57.7

7/ 26.9

3/ 11.5

–

1/ 3.8

 Tutor’s responsiveness

18/ 69.2

7/ 26.9

–

–

1/ 3.8