From: A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool for purchasing off-patent oncology medicines in Egypt
Criterion | Rationale of the criterion |
---|---|
Use in reference countries | To assure approval from other trusted marketing authorization bodies |
Equivalence with the reference product | To capture evidence on equivalence with originator product (bioequivalence, efficacy, safety) |
Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturing quality | To capture evidence on API manufacturer quality and standardization |
Finished product manufacturing quality | To capture evidence on pharmaceutical product manufacturer quality and standardization |
Pharmacovigilance services | To capture evidence on provision of proper pharmacovigilance services |
Supply reliability | To capture reliability and stability of drug supply (to avoid shortages) |
Previous use in local settings | To consider previous local insights and experience with the product |
Macro-economic benefit | To capture wider economic benefits of selecting the medicine (e.g., tax, investment, employment, etc.) |
Ease of use | To assure ease of use and convenience from the healthcare facility perspective |
Expiry date | To incentivize products with high stability and further expiry ranges |
Storage conditions | To incentivize products that do not require special storage conditions |
Refund or replacement of expired products | To incentivize manufacturers who provide refunds or replacements of expired products |
Production capacity and financial ability of the company | To ensure the manufacturer’s ability to supply the required quantities without shortages and on time |