Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality assessment of the included studies

From: Drug-related problems and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

JBI’s critical appraisal checklist, 2017

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Q11

Mohammednur et al. 2014 [45]

Yes

Yes

No

yes

No

No

Yes

No

NA

NA

NA

Gebre et al. 2017 [34]

Yes

yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Gobezie et al. 2014 [46]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Gobezie et al. 2013 [24]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Aster et al. 2019 [26]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Yaschilal et al. 2014 [43]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

NA

Abadir et al. 2015 [47]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Gashaw et al. 2016 [54]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Yirga et al. 2015 [27]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Tamene et al. 2014 [28]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Bereket et al. 2014 [29]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Mohammed et al. 2016 [30]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Mequanent et al. 2014 [55]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Asgedom et al. 2016 [48]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Kaleab et al. 2015 [49]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

NA

NA

NA

Eskinder et al. 2013 [33]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Hailu et al. 2015 [50]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Malede et al. 2018 [36]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Beshir et al. 2017 [37]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Elham et al. 2017 [25]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Mohammed et al. 2014 [38]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Tadele et al. 2015 [53]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Ayele et al. 2017 [41]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Tamene et al. 2017 [28]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Haymen et al. 2018 [40]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

NA

NA

NA

Berhane et al. 2017 [31]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Gobezie et al. 2013 [50]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yohannes et al. 2017 [41]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

NA

NA

NA

Bereket et al. 2013 [32]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Gizachew et al. 2018 [44]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

Gubae et al. 2017 [39]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Gosaye et al. [33]

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

UC

Yes

No

Yes

  1. NA not applicable, UC-unclear; Q1-11, JBI's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort studies [Q1: Were the two groups similar and recruited from the same population? Q2: Were the exposures measured similarly to assign people to both exposed and unexposed groups? Q3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Q4: Were confounding factors identified? Q5: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Q6: Were the groups/participants free of the outcome at the start of the study (or at the moment of exposure)? Q7: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Q8: Was the follow-up time reported and sufficient to be long enough for outcomes to occur? Q9: Was follow up complete, and if not, were the reasons to loss to follow up described and explored? Q10: Were strategies to address incomplete follow up utilized? Q11: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?]; Q1-8, JBI's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional studies [Q1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? Q2: Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? Q3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? Q4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? Q5: Were confounding factors identified? Q6: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? Q7: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way? Q8: Was an appropriate statistical analysis used?]