Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of parameters used in the base case analysis of cost-effectiveness of varenicline, combined nicotine replacement therapy, or no pharmacotherapy

From: Using cost-effectiveness analysis to support policy change: varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in Jordan

Parameter

Value

Reference (if applicable)

Prevalence of smokers per age group

30–39, 61.3%; 40–49, 61.4%; 50–59, 62.3%; 60+, 24.8%

Jaghbir et al. [6]

Prevalence of smokers intending to quit in the next 30 days

49%

Abughosh et al. [16]

Effectiveness (derived 52-week abstinence rates)

Baker and Pietri, Fiore et al., Stead et al. [20,21,22]

 Varenicline

17.9%

 NRTs

13.3%

 No medication (single physician visit)

5.0%

Probability of remaining abstinent having quit by 52 weeks

95%

Hughes et al. [28]

Risk of relapse after one year of abstinence

8%

Hughes et al. [28]

Unaided quit in subsequent years

2.9%

Jaghbir et al. [6]

Jordanian life table numbers were used to obtain the gender-specific death rate for each age group. We then used Taylor et al.’s study to derive the hazard ratio of death for smokers in each group, plus the hazard for death among quitters according to the time since they quit (Appendix 1)

30–34 years, 0.005 × 1.6875; 35–39 years, 0.007 × 1.6875; 40–44 years, 0.011 × 2.34; 45–49 years, 0.018 × 2.34; 50–54 years, 0.03 × 2.82; 55–59 years, 0.051 × 2.82; 60–64 years, 0.081 × 2.80; 65–69 years, 0.129 × 2.80; 70–74 years, 0.205 × 2.52

WHO and Taylor et al. [1, 23]

Costs of treatment (US dollars)

Pharmaceutical unit prices retrieved from the Jordanian Food and Drug Administration (JFDA) [29]

 Varenicline, physician visits (3 months)

270.00

 NRTs, physician visits (3 months)

192.00

 No medication (three physician visits)

21.00

Discount rate

3%

Attema et al. [19]

Cost-effectiveness threshold

JD3116/$4395 (generous); JD1636/$2307 (conservative)*; JD8000 by WHO

Woods et al. and

WHO [24, 25]

  1. *The midpoint was selected for a range (approximately 0.21 to 0.84 times the per capita GDP) calculated by Woods et al.