Relevance
|
Rationales for limit-setting decisions must rest on reasons (information and values) that fair-minded parties (managers, clinicians, patients, and affected others) can agree are relevant to meeting health care needs under resources constraints in the priority setting context
|
Publicity
|
Limit-setting decisions and their rationales must be publicly accessible
|
Appeals
|
There is a mechanism for challenge and dispute resolution regarding limit-setting decisions, including the opportunity for revising decisions in light of further evidence or arguments
|
Enforcement
|
There is either voluntary or public regulation of the process to ensure that the first three conditions are met.
|